Monday, April 16, 2012

Saving the Kimberley. It matters in Sydney.

Why saving the Kimberley matters
by Isabel McIntosh
Published in Greenvoice, April 2012

19th April - Attend a Sydney talk with Greens Senator Rachel Siewert and Wilderness Society's Lyndon Schneiders


Australia is in a race for gas, urged on by our state and federal governments. But from Broome to Sydney, a grassroots movement that includes indigenous people, environmentalists, city folk, farmers, social justice advocates, climate activists and climate sceptics are petitioning to stop the mining industry’s use and abuse of our land for short term profits. Citizens across Australia are telling the government to take notice: there is no social license for the damage from gas mining to our environment, heritage, water—and communities.
 
The Kimberley is an area twice the size of Victoria with some of the largest intact natural areas left on the planet. It also includes a marine environment that is significant for many threatened and endangered species such as sharks, dugong, coastal dolphins, turtles and whales.

Many indigenous tribes have claim to the land and Broome, a two and a half hour flight north of Perth, is the centre of the region’s thriving tourism industry. Yet the area is set to be industrialised on a vast scale.

At James Price Point, 60km north of Broome, resources giant Woodside has forty five billion dollar plans for a liquid natural gas (LNG) processing plant that will take 6000 workers six years to build and include a 5km x 5km slab of concrete. It would be the largest piece of non-government infrastructure ever created in Australia.

Ironically three of Woodside’s joint venture partners on the project—BP, Shell and Chevron—would prefer the project be relocated to the North West Shelf in the Pilbara where there is already existing infrastructure. But the Federal and WA governments are supporting the James Price Point site because the infrastructure that will need to be built for the LNG project (airport, port, roads, pipelines etc) will support the opening up of the entire region for mining and industrialization. This would potentially include bauxite mining on the Mitchell Plateau, large-scale irrigated agriculture in the Fitzroy valley and gas drilling in the Canning basin. This is all inherently unsustainable in this wilderness landscape.

In the new Energy Whitepaper from Resource Minister Martin Ferguson, gas is revealed as the Australia’s future. Yet as Dr Robert Merkel from Monash University recently wrote, there is a lack of proven 'cleaner than gas' credentials from Coal Seam Gas mining companies. Currently there are still no independent, publicly available studies of fugitive emissions for coal seam gas  in Australia  or anywhere else in the world. Until they present real data on fugitive emissions the social license of the CSG industry to operate as a less damaging alternative to coal is no better than conjecture.

A gas future is not a not going to help fight climate change and reduce greenhouse emissions and it is an opportunity cost for our clean energy future every time a new gas application is approved by government.

There is also a social justice issue about why governments are allowing mining companies to ‘buy’ the right to mine on Native Title lands with large offers to Aboriginal Land Councils of money for health and education. When did health and education stop being a basic citizenship right for Australians? Why should the health and education services available to Aboriginal people in the Kimberley be dependent on their acquiescence in the destruction of their land?

The Greens are taking action to support the fight against gas and the industrialisation of the Kimberley. But so must we all. As individuals, as no-one wants to wake up in twenty years when Broome has been Dubai’d and say, ‘How did we let that happen? Why did we destroy this environment and its culture? Was it really just for gas?’

Can’t eat coal. Can’t drink gas. Can say no.

Attend a talk in Sydney with Greens Senator from WA Rachel Siewert talking and Lyndon Schneiders from Wilderness Society (it's TWS largest environmental campaign ever) on Thursday 19th April. 

More information on the Kimberley campaign
Dr. Anne Poelina’s story: Locking the Gate and vetoing mining on Native Title Land

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

How to buy off a community - and the question of MPs representing theirs

On Gruen Planet last night (9th November 2011) Toby Murphy explained how to buy off a community. “I worked on a major (major) infrastructure project years ago and we had some particularly difficult people up against us. We developed a six point check list,” he said then listed the ways. It seemed insane he could remember them all until at the end he said, we had an aide-memoir to help…


Forge local relationships

Understand local concerns

Create local opinion leaders

Claim the middle ground

Engage local activitist as consultants

Marginalise the remainder


Here’s the youtube.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHWso24nzgE

Funny but that’s what good governance and best interests of community is up against. Any local activist that is seduced by the big end of town is no community representative (oooh, I’m just thinking about the demise of NSW Labor… Kristina K and CSG mining, what is a local MP representative outside the Greens these days but someone who is a big end of town rep – maybe not alone but through their own party)

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Why a Vote for Green Counts

With Labor and Liberal so similar in key areas, Green is the only option for progressive voters wanting someone to represent their concerns on what sort of Australia we want to live in.

• IF YOU’RE A PROGRESSIVE VOTER voting Green is the only vote that currently represents this and will make the ALP a more compassionate, humanitarian party...
• GREENS FUNDING - Whichever party you vote 1 for gets the funding for next time. By giving your first preference to a major party, you’re helping lock in more of the same policies. By giving it to the Greens, you’re helping to achieve real debate – and reform.
• YOU CAN STILL PREFERENCE LABOR SECOND - If you vote Greens and preference ALP, then you’re telling Labor that they’re not representing the progressive views of voters.By voting 1 for the Greens and preferencing the ALP, your vote is just as strong at keeping Tony Abbott out – but you also, critically, make the ALP less like him.
• GREENS IN GOVERNMENT WILL REPRESENT YOUR VOICE ON KEY ISSUES such as Climate Change, Infrastructure, Mining… The Greens bring a new voice to the debate on key issues such as climate change and refugees and where there’s currently very little policy difference between the major parties.
• GREENS IN GOVERNMENT CAN IMPROVE MAIN PARTY POLICY on your key issues of climate change, congestion, water scarcity, mental health, asylum seeker policy. Look at how Greens in the Senate made the economic stimulus better with a jobs dividend for rural and regional Australia.
• PUTTING LABOR NO. 2 or ANOTHER PARTY ON YOUR VOTING PAPER means this party will get your vote IF the Green candidate doesn’t win.
DID YOU KNOW?
• The Greens have five Senators in the Parliament of Australia, 22 elected representatives in State and Territory Parliaments, more than 100 local councillors and close to 10,000 party members.
• In the 2007 election, the Greens scored more than 9% of the national vote yet got no Lower House seats. Is this democracy?

(thanks to anonymous lefty for quite a few of these points)

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Margaret River Coast Should Be A Marine Sanctury - So why has the govt released drilling permits?

The WA mob are a strange bunch. A few weeks ago they were pumping their fists at an anti-tax rally led by some of the nation’s billionaire oil barrons. Now their cousins down the coast at  Margaret River are wanting to stop these same miners from drilling following the govt’s approval in May of a new oil lease just 83kms off the coast.

Last year Australia had its own devastating oil spill in northwest WA at the Montara Oil Field – what if this had been Margaret River – the 22,000 whales who pass through each year wouldn’t have been happy and unlike refugees they can’t enjoy camp life until they join the queue for the east coast states of Australia. I’ve signed the petition and requested a bumper sticker.  Here's my letter to Julia10:

Dear Prime Minister
Last year Australia had its own devastating oil spill in northwest WA at the Montara Oil Field. Now less than a year later - and following the devastating Lousiana Oil Spill and Obama's cancellation of all new offshore drilling - the Labor govt has approved new oil leases in proposed marine sanctuaries off the glorious coastline of Margaret River.
All Australians will be impoverished if something goes wrong, only oil magnates get rich (now the RSPT has been diminished) from the venture. Can your govt show its leadership in easing our dependency on oil, not feed further it.
Please establish a world-class network of large marine sanctuaries in Australia's South West, where up to 90% of the marine life is unique, but less than 1% protected. Did you know 22,000 whales a year pass thru the area - and 1/2 million visitors go there annually? As Peter Garrett commented on 7.30 Report - you can never 100% guarantee an accident won't happen. Oil drilling and spills are the very sort of risk that sanctuaries are supposed to safeguard against. Stop the conflict, follow thru on making this area a sanctuary and ban mining in perpetuity.  Best wishes, Why-is-it-progressive-to-want-to-protect-the-environment-ita.